Much of who we are comes from the
foods that we eat; it can come from the individuality that it gives us within a
group, or it can be a way to fit into a group. In “Breaking Bread with a Spread”
and “The Cultural Politics of Eating in Shenzhen”, the authors explore the ways
that food and communities are linked within specific groups and the different
roles that these foods have within the communities.
In “Breaking
Bread with a Spread”, Sandra Cate looks into the foods that inmates in a local
prison eat and the ways in which the food brings them together while also
setting them apart within the prison community. The main cuisine that she looks
into is called “spread”. Spread is different for every inmate , but it is
basically a mixture of whatever ingredients an inmate likes within the limited
ingredients in the prison. Spread is a way for the inmates to use their
creativity. They create many different spreads by experimenting with everything
at their disposal, often trying to recreate meals that they loved from the
outside. The spreads are also a way for inmates to connect with one another.
Spreads are almost always eaten with other inmates, and the groups that are
formed are usually based off of common tastes and cultures. As inmate Kermit
Saunders said, “It’s like we bonding in here when we break bread with a spread”.
Mary
Ann O’Donnell examines a much larger and different group in “The Cultural
Politics of Eating in Shenzhen”. She looks into the ways that China is divided
based upon the foods that they eat and the areas that they live in, and how
this affects the kind of people that they are. For example, the people that
live in southern China mostly eat fish. Fish is very hard to come by, so
southerners are forced to be “sneaky” and “quick-witted” to get the food that
they need. In Northern China, however, there are cows, and cows are not very
hard to capture and kill. This difference in cultures created a more honest
group of people in Northern China because they did not have to fight for their
food, but northerners did not become as intelligent and crafty as the
southerners because they did not learn the skills from the fight for food. As
time has gone along, there has also been a division caused by the age of the
people of Shenzhen. The “Old Shenzheners” often have experience from living in
the countryside which has given them a great appreciation for the food of the
city. Meanwhile, “New Shenzheners” do not have these experiences so they are
fully immersed in the city lifestyle and think of their food in a much
different way.
In
these articles the authors are looking at very different communities, but they
are very similar in the ways in which food brings them together. In Cate’s
article about prison the inmates are divided based upon their tastes and
previous culture, but they were also able to express themselves through the
food. In O’Donnell’s article they are united by the areas that they come from
as well as their life’s experiences. I found it interesting in prison that something
like food could set someone apart through their individual exploits with food,
but it could also bring them together and give them a sense of belonging. I
also found it interesting that the food of each area of China not only changed
the tastes of the people, but it also changed the personality types associated
with the groups.
Gabe, I think you did a very good job at understanding what the two authors were trying to get at. Also, I really liked how you explained how food can set people apart but also bring them together.
ReplyDelete